Attorney General William Tong of Connecticut has been at the forefront of several significant legal battles, challenging federal policies and advocating for the rights of states and their citizens. Among these, Tong has announced pending lawsuits against actions by the federal government, including a notable case involving the DOGE action, which he deems unlawful. This move is part of a broader effort by Tong and attorneys general from at least 10 other states to hold the federal government accountable for what they see as overreach.

In addition to these legal challenges, Tong has been vocal in his criticism of the Trump administration's policies, particularly those affecting federal employees and the provision of gender-affirming care. He has described a buyout proposal to federal employees as misleading and has joined a coalition of attorneys general to protect access to gender-affirming care, emphasizing the importance of healthcare decisions being made by patients, families, and doctors, not politicians.

Tong's legal actions extend beyond healthcare and employment issues. He has also announced a $1.5 million settlement with the used car dealership Carvana, following hundreds of consumer complaints. This settlement underscores Tong's commitment to consumer protection and holding corporations accountable for their practices.

Furthermore, Tong has been critical of the Department of Justice's threat to defund police departments that do not support federal immigration enforcement, labeling it as an attempt to distract local law enforcement from serious public safety threats. His leadership in these legal battles reflects a broader commitment to protecting the rights and well-being of Connecticut residents and upholding the principles of state sovereignty and federalism.

As Tong continues to lead these legal efforts, his actions highlight the critical role of state attorneys general in challenging federal policies and advocating for the rights of their citizens. Through these legal battles, Tong is not only addressing immediate concerns but also setting important precedents for the balance of power between state and federal governments.