The Supreme Court of India has granted interim protection to podcaster and influencer Ranveer Allahbadia in a case related to his obscene remarks on the show 'India's Got Latent'. The court, while granting the protection, also pulled him up for his behavior, stating that such actions have to be condemned and that he should be ashamed of what he has done to his parents. Allahbadia was represented by senior advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, the son of former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, who argued that the FIRs against his client should be clubbed and that he should not be arrested.

Chandrachud, in his arguments, stated that people have entered the clinic of Allahbadia's mother posing as patients and threatened her, and that one of the co-accused has been threatened with an acid attack. He also drew a parallel with the case of Nupur Sharma, who had faced similar threats and had her FIRs clubbed by the Supreme Court. Chandrachud argued that if the court could grant relief to Sharma, it should also consider doing the same for Allahbadia. However, the court was not convinced by this argument and stated that Allahbadia's behavior was unacceptable and that he had something "very dirty" in his mind which he "vomited" on the show.

The case has sparked a debate about the limits of free speech and the responsibility that comes with it. While some have argued that Allahbadia's remarks were unacceptable and that he should face the consequences, others have argued that he should not be arrested and that the court should exercise its discretion in the matter. The Supreme Court's decision to grant interim protection to Allahbadia has been seen as a balance between the two views, as it allows him to avoid arrest while also ensuring that he cooperates with the ongoing investigation.

The incident has also highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about the impact of words on others. Allahbadia's remarks, which were made on a public platform, have been widely condemned and have sparked outrage across the country. The incident has also raised questions about the role of social media platforms in regulating content and ensuring that users do not post offensive or inflammatory material. As the case continues to unfold, it is likely that these issues will be debated and discussed in greater detail.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's decision to grant interim protection to Ranveer Allahbadia is a significant development in the case. While the court has pulled him up for his behavior, it has also ensured that he is not arrested and that he cooperates with the ongoing investigation. The case has sparked a debate about the limits of free speech and the responsibility that comes with it, and has highlighted the need for greater sensitivity and awareness about the impact of words on others. As the case continues to unfold, it is likely that these issues will be debated and discussed in greater detail, and that the court will have to navigate the complex issues involved in the case.